Investigating the Impact of Despotic Leadership on Healthcare Workers’ Psychological Well-Being in Pakistan: Mediating Role of Emotional Exhaustion and Interaction Avoidance

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29145/jmr.131.04

Keywords:

despotic leadership, emotional exhaustion, healthcare workers, interaction avoidance, psychological well-being, Pakistan

Abstract

This research explores the complex mechanisms through which despotic leadership affects the mental health of paramedical staff in Pakistan's healthcare sector, drawing on the Social Exchange Theory. In an attempt to find the truth behind the effect of despotic leadership on employees, the paramedical staff from the health sector was chosen from public hospitals of Rawalpindi and Islamabad. A total of 154 respondents filled the self-administered questionnaire. Simple linear regression was applied to check Hypothesis 1 (which was accepted). Mediation and moderation analyses, including the estimation of total, direct, and indirect effects, were conducted using PROCESS Models 4 and 1, respectively. The results of both mediation and moderation analysis showed partial mediation and moderation. Exploring the managerial context, an investigation is needed to understand the mechanism of despotic leadership through training such leaders and instilling an essence of ethical leadership. The results of this study may shed light on how to improve the mental well-being of paramedical staff and reduce the negative outcomes of despotic leadership through training, mentoring, and counseling. Both the HR and HRD managers can hire employees properly and can also train them in future to create a better working environment. Shedding light upon the social exchange theory, this research uses the mediating role of emotional exhaustion to check the effect of despotic leadership on employees’ psychological well-being and interaction avoidance as a coping and buffering mechanism to check the effect of despotic leadership on emotional exhaustion.

Author Biographies

Jaweria Tariq, Rawalpindi Women University

Department of Business Administration, Rawalpindi Women University, Islamabad, Pakistan
Department of Management Sciences, National University of Modern Languages, Islamabad, Pakistan

Hafsah Zahur, National University of Modern Languages

Department of Management Sciences, National University of Modern Languages, Islamabad, Pakistan

Muhammad Ahsan Iqbal, Rawalpindi Women University

Department of Business Administration, Rawalpindi Women University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan

Muhammad Imran Janjua, Shifa College of Medicine

Specialist Ophthalmologist, Shifa College of Medicine, Islamabad, Pakistan

References

Asendorpf, J. B. (1990). Beyond social withdrawal: Shyness, unsociability, and peer avoidance. Human Development, 33, 250–259. https://doi.org/10.1159/000276522

Balwant, P. (2019). Stay close! The role of leader distance in the relationship between transformational leadership, work engagement, and performance in undergraduate project teams. Journal of Education for Business, 94(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2018.1541851

Blau, P. (2017). Exchange and power in social life. Routledge.

Camgoz, S., & Karapinar, P. (2021). Measuring destructive leadership. Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80043-180-520211012

Charoensukmongkol, P., & Phungsoonthorn, T. (2022). The interaction effect of crisis communication and social support on the emotional exhaustion of university employees during the COVID-19 crisis. International Journal of Business Communication, 59(2), 269–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294884211028615

Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155

Cropanzano, R., Daniels, S., Anthony, E., & Hall, A. (2017). Social exchange theory: A critical review with theoretical remedies. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0099.

De Hoogh, A. H. B., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2008). Ethical and despotic leadership, relationships with leader's social responsibility, top management team effectiveness and subordinates' optimism: A multi-method study. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(3), 297–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.03.002

D’Souza, G., Irudayasamy, F., Aktharsha, U., Andiappan, V. S., & Parayitam, S. (2021). The effect of emotional intelligence and psychological capital on knowledge, service and leadership excellence: Knowledge sharing and trust as moderators. FIIB Business Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/23197145211065087

De Hoogh, A. H., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2008). Ethical and despotic leadership, relationships with leader's social responsibility, top management team effectiveness and subordinates' optimism: A multi-method study. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(3), 297–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.03.002

Detert, J. R., Treviño, L. K., Burris, E. R., & Andiappan, M. (2007). Managerial modes of influence and counterproductivity in organizations: A longitudinal business-unit-level investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 993–1005. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.993

Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Biswas-Diener, R., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D. W., & Oishi, S. (2009). New measures of well-being. In E. Diener (Ed.), Assessing well-being: The collected works of Ed Diener (pp. 247–266). Springer Netherlands.

Emerson, R. M. (1976). Social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 335–362. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.02.080176.002003

Erkutlu, H., & Chafra, J. (2018). Despotic leadership and organizational deviance: The mediating role of organizational identification and the moderating role of value congruence. Journal of Strategy and Management, 11(2), 150–165. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-09-2017-0064

Fischer, T., Tian, A., Lee, A., & Hughes, D. (2021). Abusive supervision: A systematic review and fundamental rethink. The Leadership Quarterly, 32, Article e101540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101540

Glasø, L., Einarsen, S., Matthiesen, S. B., & Skogstad, A. (2010). The dark side of leaders: A representative study of interpersonal problems among leaders. Scandinavian Journal of Organizational Psychology, 2(1), 12–25.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Education.

Harvey, P., Stoner, J., Hochwarter, W., & Kacmar, C. (2007). Coping with abusive supervision: The neutralizing effects of ingratiation and positive affect on negative employee outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(3), 264–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.03.001

Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.

Hobfoll, S. E., Halbesleben, J., Neveu, J. P., & Westman, M. (2018). Conservation of Resources in the organizational context: The reality of resources and their consequences. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5, 103–128. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104640

Hou, Y., Xiong, D., Jiang, T., Song, L., & Wang, Q. (2019). Social media addiction: Its impact, mediation, and intervention. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cberspace, 13(1), Article e4. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2019-1-4

Hu, X., & Shi, J. (2015). Employees' surface acting in interactions with leaders and peers. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(8), 1132–1152. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2015

Ito, J. K., & Brotheridge, C. M. (2003). Resources, coping strategies, and emotional exhaustion: A conservation of resources perspective. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63(3), 490–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-8791(03)00044-9

Jabeen, N., & Rahim, N. A. (2021). Exploring the effects of despotic leadership on employee engagement, trust, and task performance. Management Science Letters, 11(1), 223–232. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2020.8.012

Kalshoven, K., & Boon, C. (2012). Ethical leadership, employee well-being, and helping: The moderating role of human resource management. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 11(2), 60–68. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000056

Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1991). The concept of coping. In R. S. Lazarus & S. Folkman (Eds.), Stress and coping: An anthology (pp. 189–206). Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/mona92982-017

Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1981). The measurement of experienced burnout. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2(2), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030020205

Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (2008). Early predictors of job burnout and engagement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(3), 498–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.498

Naseer, S., Raja, U., Syed, F., Donia, M., & Darr, W. (2016). Perils of being close to a bad leader in a bad environment. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(2), 270–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.09.005

Nauman, S., Zheng, C., & Basit, A. (2020). How despotic leadership jeopardizes employees' performance. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 41(4), 489–504. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-11-2019-0476

Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill.

Padilla, A., Hogan, R., & Kaiser, R. B. (2007). The toxic triangle. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(3), 176–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.03.001

Perrewé, P. L., & Ganster, D. C. (Eds.). (2011). The role of individual differences in occupational stress and well-being. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-3555(2011)9

Raja, U., Haq, I. U., De Clercq, D., & Azeem, M. (2019). When ethics create misfit. International Journal of Psychology, 55(2), 234–250. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12606

Rasool, G., Naseer, S., Syed, F., & Ahmed, I. (2018). Despotic leadership and employees' outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 86, 150–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.030

Raza, M. A., Imran, M., & Ul Hadi, N. (2024). Impact of despotic leadership on workplace incivility. NUST Business Review, 5(2), 68–85. https://doi.org/10.37435/nbr.v5i2.68

Ryff, C. D. (2013). Psychological well-being revisited. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 83(1), 10–28. https://doi.org/10.1159/000353263

Samad, A., Muchiri, M., & Shahid, S. (2021). Investigating leadership and employee well-being. Personnel Review, 50(5), 1313–1334. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-05-2020-0340

Sattar, S., & Malik, M. (2019). The effects of despotic leadership and sexual harassment. Review of Economics and Development Studies, 5(2), 269–282. https://doi.org/10.26710/reads.v5i2.587

Stern, I., & Westphal, J. D. (2010). Stealthy footsteps to the boardroom: Executives' backgrounds, sophisticated interpersonal influence behavior, and board appointments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(2), 278–319. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2010.55.2.278

Tepper, B. J., Moss, S. E., & Duffy, M. K. (2011). Predictors of abusive supervision: Supervisor perceptions of deep-level dissimilarity, relationship conflict, and subordinate performance. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 279–294.

Thoroughgood, C., Sawyer, K., Padilla, A., & Lunsford, L. (2018). Destructive leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 151(4), 889–904. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3257-9

Volmer, J., Koch, I. K., & Göritz, A. S. (2016). The bright and dark sides of leaders’ dark triad traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 101, 413–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.039

Watson, D., & Friend, R. (1969). Measurement of social-evaluative anxiety. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33(4), 448–457. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027806.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Tariq, J., Zahur, H., Iqbal, M. A., & Janjua, M. I. (2026). Investigating the Impact of Despotic Leadership on Healthcare Workers’ Psychological Well-Being in Pakistan: Mediating Role of Emotional Exhaustion and Interaction Avoidance. Journal of Management and Research, 13(1), 75–100. https://doi.org/10.29145/jmr.131.04

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.