Analysis of Higher Education Reforms in Pakistan: A Public Management Perspective
Abstract
The current study aimed to analyze higher education reforms in Pakistan from the perspective of public management approaches, traditional public administration, NPM, network governance, and new Weberian. Moreover, the study analyzed higher education reforms to situate and locate them in the context of wider international public management imperatives that have given rise to them. Additionally, the current study argued that higher education reforms in Pakistan have been intricately linked with the increasing globalization of the world which is also a cause of decrease in state autonomy. Multiple case study approach was employed to conduct the current study. The data was collected through semi-structured interviews with designated stakeholders of the reform process. Six universities and HEC head office were selected to collect the data. Document analysis and member checks were also used to triangulate the data collected through semi-structured interviews. After the data analysis, findings revealed the complexity of higher education reform process in Pakistan due to the presence of a hybrid structure of public administration paradigms. In a nutshell, the current research employed a public management investigative approach to study higher education reforms pertaining to their goals, design, instruments, implementation, evaluation, and outcomes in terms of strength and weaknesses in higher education in Pakistan.
References
Ahmad, T. (2020). Scenario based approach to re-imagining future of higher education which prepares students for the future of work. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 10(1), 217–238. https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-12-2018-0136
Ali, S., & Tahir, M. (2009). Reforming education in Pakistan – Tracing global links. Journal of Research and Reflections in Education, 3(1), 1–16.
Altbach, P., Bloom, D., Hopper, R., Psacharopoulos, G., & Rosovsky, H. (2004). The task force on higher education and society. Comparative Education Review, 48(1), 70–88. https://doi.org/10.1086/379844
Amir, S., Sharf, N., & Khan, R. A. (2020). Pakistan’s education system: An analysis of education policies and drawbacks. Electronic Research Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(1), 2706–2729.
Aristovnik, A., Murko, E., & Ravšelj, D. (2022). From neo-weberian to hybrid governance models in public administration: Differences between state and local self-government. Administrative Sciences, 12(1), Article e26. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12010026
Ashraf, J. (2017). Public sector appointments, political influence and performance: Perceptions of the situation in Pakistan. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 39(3), 211–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2017.1365467
Awwad, B., Anaewah, M., Razia, B., & Salameh, M. (2023). Governance boards of trustees: Quality of higher education and the outputs of scientific research. Journal of Business and Socio-economic Development, 4(1), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBSED-03-2023-0021
Bennett, D. (2018). Graduate employability and higher education; Past, present and future. HERDSA Review of Higher Education, 5, 31–68.
Bevir, M. (2022). What is the decentered state? Public Policy and Administration, 37(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076720904993
Boer, H. F., & File, J. (2009). Higher education governance reforms across Europe. ESMU. http://hdl.voced.edu.au/10707/252071
Borodina, T., Sibgatullina, A., & Gizatullina, A. (2019). Developing creative thinking in future teachers as a topical issue of higher education. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 10, 226–245.
Bouckaert, G. (2022). Public management and politics: Oxymoron or new political paradigm for the state sector? In A. Ladner, & F. Sager (Eds.), Handbook on the politics of public administration. Edward Elgar Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/9781839109447
Bouckaert, G. (2023). The neo-Weberian state: From ideal type model to reality? Max Weber Studies, 23(1), 13–59. https://doi.org/10.1353/max.2023.0002
Bouckaert, G., & Jann, W. (2020). European perspectives for public administration; The way forward. Leuven University Press. https://doi.org/10.11116/9789461663078
Broucker, B., & Wit, K. D. (2015). New public management in higher education. In J. Huisman, H. Boer, D. D. Dill, & M. Souto-Otero, The Palgrave International Handbook of Higher Education Policy and Governance (pp. 57–75). Palgrave Macmillan.
Broucker, B., Ursin, J., Dal Molin, M., & De Wit, K. (2022). To achieve the same as the others? Policy preconditions for successful higher education governance. International Journal of Public Administration, 45(2), 84–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2021.1942045
Broucker, B., Wit, K. D., & Verhoeven, J. C. (2017). Higher education research: Looking beyond new public management. In J. Huisman, & M. Tight, Theory and method in higher education research (pp. 21–38). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2056-375220170000003002
Brunsson, N., & Sahlin-Andersson, K. (2000). Constructing organizations: The example of public sector reform. Organization Studies, 21(4), 123–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840600214003
Calhoun, C. (Ed.) (2010). Robert K. Merton: Sociology of science and sociology as science. Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/calh15112
Capano, G. (2011). Government continues to do its job. A comparative study of governance shifts in higher education sector. Public Administration, 89(4), 1622–1642. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01936.x
Dimmock, C. (2020). Connecting research and knowledge on educational leadership in the West and Asia: Adopting a cross-cultural comparative perspective. Comparative Education, 56, 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2019.1703393
Dougherty, K. J., & Natow, R. S. (2020). Performance-based funding for higher education: how well does neoliberal theory capture neoliberal practice? Higher Education, 80, 457–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00491-4
Drechsler, W. (2020). Good bureaucracy: Max weber and public administration today. Max Weber Studies, 20(2), 219–224.
Editors. (2004). The task force on higher education and society. Comparative Education Review, 48(1), 70–88.
Farazmand, A. (1999). Globalization and public administration. Public Administration Review, 59(6), 509–522. https://doi.org/10.2307/3110299
Farazmand, A. (2023). Global encyclopedia of public administration, public policy, and governance. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66252-3
Farrukh, M., Lee, J. W., & Shahzad, I. A. (2019). Intrapreneurial behavior in higher education institutes of Pakistan: The role of leadership styles and psychological empowerment. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 11(2), 273–294. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-05-2018-0084
Fuller, K., & Stevenson, H. (2019). Global education reform: understanding the movement. Educational Review, 71(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2019.1532718
Giroux, H. (2002). Neoliberalism, corporate culture, and the promise of higher education: The university as a democratic public sphere. Harvard Educational Review, 72(4), 425–464. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.72.4.0515nr62324n71p1
Gornitzka, A., Kogan, M., & Amaral, A. (2005). Reform and change in higher education (Vol. 8). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3411-3
Haque, M. (2019). The changing foundations of public administration: from identity to modernity to diversity. International Review of Public Administration, 24(2), 138–145 . https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2019.1632042
Hargreaves, A. (2003). Teaching in the knowledge society: Education in the age of insecurity. Teachers College Press.
Harvey, D. (2007). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.
Hazelkorn, E., & Gibson, A. (2019). Public goods and public policy: What is public good, and who and what decides? Higher Education, 78, 257–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0341-3
Hussain, M. (2017, March 26–27). Macro-level analysis of doctoral education in Pakistan for pursuit of international quality education. New horizons: dissolving boundaries for a quality region (Paper presentation). New Horizons: Dissolving boundaries for a quality region. Mascoe, Russia.
Jones, B. M., & Ball, S. J. (2023). Neoliberalism and education. Taylor and Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003253617
Katsamunska, P. (2012). Classical and modern approaches to public administration. Economic Alternatives, (1), 74–81.
Khan, B., Mustafa, G., & Nawaz, A. (2021). Flourishing the higher education in Pakistan: An exploratory analysis of the role of higher education commission (HEC). Journal of Applied Economics and Business Studies, 5(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.34260/jaebs.531
Khan, T., Bibi, I., & Khan, R. (2018). Higher education commission (HEC), Pakistan: its current role and responsibilities, problems in higher education, and suggested futuristic reforms (in a futuristic milieu). Pakistan Journal of Society, Education and Language, 4(1), 120–138.
Krücken, G. (2014). Higher education reforms and unintended consequences: A research agenda. Studies in Higher Education, 39(8), 1439–1450. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.949539
Kuhlmann, S., & Wollmann, H. (2019). Introduction to comparative public administration, administrative systems and reforms in Europe. Cheltenhem: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Marginson, S. (2022). What is global higher education? Oxford Review of Education, 48(4), 492–517, https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2022.2061438
Meier, K. J. (2015). Proverbs and the evolution of public administration. Public Administration Review, 75(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12288
Miller, H. T., & Fox, C. J. (2007). Postmodern public administration. Routledge.
Morozumi, A. (2019). Higher education reform: focusing on national university reform. Education in Japan, 47, 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2632-5_12
Muyters, G., Broucker, B., & Witte, K. D. (2021). On higher education’s complexities and the potential of network governance. A case study. International Journal of Public Administration, 45, 198–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2021.2003813
Nhema, A. G. (2015). Relevance of classical management theories to modern public administration: A review. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 5(3), 165–179. http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/jpag.v5i3.8337
Nicotera, A. M. (2019). Classical management theory. In A. M. Nicotera (Ed.), Origins and traditions of organizational communication (pp. 89–105). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203703625
Noor, S., Isa, F. M., & Mazhar, F. F. (2020). Online teaching practices during the COVID 19 pandemic. Educational Process: International Journal, 9(3), 169–184.
Onder, M., & Zengin, Ü. N. (2022). A framework for comparative analysis: Public administration across the globe. In J. Huisman, H. Boer, D. D. Dill, & M. Souto-Otero (Eds.), The palgrave handbook of comparative public administration (pp. 51–76). Palgrave Macmillan Singapore.
Pollitt, C. (2009). Complexity theory and evolutionary public administration: A sceptical afterword. In G. Teisman, A. van Buuren, & L. M. Gerrits (Eds.), Managing complex governance systems (pp. 213–230). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203866160
Qutoshi, S. B. (2015). Financing of higher education in Pakistan: Initiatives, challenges and outcomes. Hope Journal of Research, 2(4), 1–14.
Roberts, A. (2018). The aims of public administration: Reviving the classical view. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 1(1), 78–85. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvx003
Sabharwal, M., & Berman, E. M. (2013). Public administration in South Asia; India, Bangladesh, and Pakistan. Taylor and Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315089294
Schwarz, G., Christensen, T., & Zhu, X. (2022). Bounded rationality, satisficing, artificial intelligence, and decision-making in public organizations: The contributions of Herbert Simon. Public Administration Review, 82(5), 902–904. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13540
Shields, P. M. (2008). Rediscovering the taproot: Is classical pragmatism the route to renew public administration? Public Administration Review, 68(2), 205–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00856.x
Terpstra, J., & Schaap, D. (2021). The politics of higher police education: An international comparative perspective. A Journal of Policy and Practice, 15(4), 2407–2418. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paab050
UNESCO. (2000). The dakar framework for Action: Education for all: meeting our collective commitments (including six regional frameworks for action). World Education Forum. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000121147
Usman, S. (2014). Governance and higher education in Pakistan: What roles do boards of governors play in ensuring the academic quality maintenance in public universities versus private universities in Pakistan? International Journal of Higher Education, 3(2), 38–51. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v3n2p38
Wamsley, G. L., & Wolf, J. F. (2007). Refounding democratic public administration. Sage.
Weber, M. (2023). Bureaucracy. In W. Longhofer, & D. Winchester (Eds.), Social theory Rewired: New connections to classical and contemporary perspectives (pp. 287–292). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003320609
Wit, H. d., & Altbach, P. G. (2021). Internationalization in higher education: Global trends and recommendations for its future. Policy Reviews in Higher Education, 5, 28–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322969.2020.1820898
Wyborn, C., Datta, A., Montana, J., Ryan, M., Leith, P., Chaffin, B. C., Miller, C. A., & Van Kerkhoff, L. (2019). Co-Producing sustainability: Reordering the governance of science, policy, and practice. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 44(1), 319–346. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-101718-033103
Zajda, J. (2020). Globalisation, ideology and neo-liberal higher education reforms. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1751-7
Copyright (c) 2023 Hudda Riaz, Nasira Jabeen, Sidra Irfan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Thus, work submitted to Journal of Management and Research implies that it is original, unpublished work of the authors; neither published previously nor accepted/under consideration for publication elsewhere.
