Determinants Shaping Choices for Robo and Human Advisors in German Financial Market: A Theoretical Review

Keywords: consumer behaviour, digital finance, financial technology, Schumpeter’s innovation theory, technology acceptance model, technology adoption life cycle, theory of reasoned action

Abstract

The financial industry has experienced a radical change brought about by the development of robo-advisors, a technology that combines financial technology (fintech) and artificial intelligence (AI). With the ongoing growth of digitalisation, AI-based advisory services are transforming the ways in which people engage in financial services to provide new inclusion and access possibilities. These platforms help people, especially those who are not financially smart enough to take advantage of investment options previously available only through the traditional advisory channels. The current theoretical analysis is a critical explanation of the introduction of robo-advisors in German financial marketplace, which is marked by high regulation, cultural conservatism, and a high degree of trust in human advisors. Based on Schumpeter’s Innovation Theory, the models adopted in terms of technology include the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), the Technology Adoption Life Cycle (TALC), and the Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA), all of which discuss the behavioural and structural levels of adoption. Although these frameworks provide useful insights into the process of innovation diffusion and user acceptance, they do not tend to consider key cultural and ethical aspects of the innovation process, such as privacy, trust, and institutional credibility. Through a synthesis of these models, the current review reveals a comprehensive picture of the interplay of technological advancement, behavioral intention, and cultural context in the decision-making process of technology adoption. It underlines the need for responsible and culturally sensitive innovation in the German fintech market and suggests its practical implications for policymakers, financial institutions, and tech developers who want to drive responsible and sustainable digitalisation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aldboush, H. H. H., & Ferdous, M. (2023). Building trust in FinTech: An analysis of ethical and privacy considerations in the intersection of big data, AI, and customer trust. International Journal of Financial Studies, 11(3), Article e90. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs11030090

Al-Suqri, M. N., & Al-Aufi, A. S. (Eds.). (2015). Information seeking behavior and technology adoption: Theories and trends. IGI Global.

Arner, D. W., Barberis, J., & Buckley, R. P. (2016). The evolution of FinTech: A new post-crisis paradigm? Georgetown Journal of International Law, 47(4), 1271–1319. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2676553

Atwal, G., & Bryson, D. (2021). Antecedents of intention to adopt artificial intelligence services by consumers in personal financial investing. Strategic Change, 30(3), 293–298. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2412

Au, C.-D. & Krahnhof, P., (2018, November 14). The role of robo-advisors in the German banking market: Critical analysis on human versus digital advisory services [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of IASTEM International Conference, Brussels, Belgium.

Aw, E. C.-X., Zha, T., & Chuah, S. H.-W. (2023). My new financial companion! Non-linear understanding of robo-advisory service acceptance. The Service Industries Journal, 43(3–4), 185–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2022.2161528

Baker, T. (2017). Regulating robo advice across the financial services industry. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2932189

Baudewyn, N., Draou, L., & Iania, L. (2020). Robo-advisors in asset management: Towards a complete automation [Master’s thesis, Université catholique de Louvain]. DIAL. http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/thesis:24576

Belanche, D., Casaló, L. V., & Flavián, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in FinTech: Understanding robo-advisors adoption among customers. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 119(7), 1411–1430. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-08-2018-0368

Cedrell, L., & Issa, N. (2018). The adoption of robo-advisory in the Swedish financial technology market: Analyzing the consumer perspective. Diva portal. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1253301/FULLTEXT01.pdf

Chintalapati, S. (2021). Early adopters to early majority: What’s driving the artificial intelligence and machine learning powered transformation in financial services? International Journal of Financial Research, 12(4), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v12n4p43

Clarke, D. (2020). Robo-advisors: Market impact and fiduciary duty of care to retail investors. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3539122

De Andrés-Sánchez, J., & Gené-Albesa, J. (2023). Explaining policyholders’ chatbot acceptance with a unified technology acceptance and use of technology-based model. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 18(3), 1217–1237. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer18030062

Dinev, T., Xu, H., & Smith, J. (2023). Understanding technology adoption: The role of trust and perceived risk. Information Systems Research, 34(1), 120–138.

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley.

Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51–90. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036519

Glaser, F., Hawlitschek, F., & Weber, T. (2022). Understanding trust in financial technology: A review and research agenda. Electronic Markets, 32(2), 341–359.

Gomber, P., Kauffman, R. J., Parker, C., & Weber, B. W. (2018). On the FinTech revolution: Interpreting the forces of innovation, disruption, and transformation in financial services. Journal of Management Information Systems, 35(1), 220–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2018.1440766

Gomber, P., Koch, J.-A., & Siering, M. (2017). Digital finance and FinTech: Current research and future research directions. Journal of Business Economics, 87, 537–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-017-0852-x

Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

Isaia, E., & Oggero, N. (2022). The potential use of robo-advisors among the young generation: Evidence from Italy. Finance Research Letters, 48, Article e103046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103046

Kim, J., Koo, B., Nam, M., Jang, K., Lee, J., Chung, M., & Song, Y. (2025). Text Mining Approaches for Exploring Research Trends in the Security Applications of Generative Artificial Intelligence. Applied Sciences, 15(6), Article e3355. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15063355

Laumer, F., Di Vece, D., Cammann, V. L., Würdinger, M., Petkova, V., Schönberger, M., Schönberger, A., Mercier, J. C., Niederseer, D., Seifert, B., Schwyzer, M., Burkholz, R., Corinzia, L., Becker, A. S., Scherff, F., Brouwers, S., Pazhenkottil, A. P., Dougoud, S., Messerli, M., . . . Templin, C. (2022). Assessment of artificial intelligence in echocardiography diagnostics in differentiating takotsubo syndrome from myocardial infarction. JAMA Cardiology, 7(5), 494–503. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2022.0183

Li, G., Wang, T., Yang, M., & Guo, F. (2025). The Impact of Perceived experience on customer privacy concerns during AI-Human Interaction: The chain mediating effect of hedonic value and trust. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 41(19), 12072–12085. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2025.2452212

Mambile, C., & Ishengoma, F. (2024). Exploring the non-linear trajectories of technology adoption in the digital age. Technological Sustainability, 3(4), 428–448. https://doi.org/10.1108/TECHS-11-2023-0050

Moden, N., & Neufeld, P. (2020, July 15). How COVID-19 accelerated digital adoption in financial services. Ernst & Young Global Limited. https://www.ey.com/en_gl/insights/financial-services/emeia/how-covid-19-has-sped-up-digitization-for-the-banking-sector

Piotrowski, D. (2022). Demographic and socio-economic factors as barriers to robo-advisory acceptance in Poland. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, Sectio H – Oeconomia, 56(3), 109–126. https://doi.org/10.17951/h.2022.56.3.109-126

Reddavide, L. (2018). The evolution of wealth management: Transformation and innovation of robo advisory [Doctoral dissertation, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia]. http://dspace.unive.it/handle/10579/13076

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.

Roh, T., Park, B. I., & Xiao, S. S. (2023). Adoption of AI-enabled robo-advisors in FinTech: Simultaneous employment of UTAUT and the theory of reasoned action. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 24(1), 29–47.

Roongruangsee, R., & Patterson, P. (2023). Engaging robo-advisors in financial advisory services: The role of psychological comfort and client psychological characteristics. Australasian Marketing Journal, 32(4), 339–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582231195990

Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle (R. Opie, Trans.). Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1911).

Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Harper & Brothers.

Singh, S., & Kumar, A. (2025). Investing in the future: An integrated model for analysing user attitudes towards robo-advisory services with AI integration. Vilakshan – XIMB Journal of Management, 22(1), 158–175. https://doi.org/10.1108/XJM-03-2024-0046

Sironi, P. (2016). FinTech innovation: From robo-advisors to goal-based investing and gamification. John Wiley & Sons.

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Swanson, C., Kopecky, K., & Tucker, I. (1997). Technology adoption over the life cycle and aggregate technological progress. The American Economic Review, 87(3), 437–456.

Tan, G. K. S. (2020). Robo-advisors and the financialization of lay investors. Geoforum, 117, 46–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.09.004

Ulrich, P., Frank, V., & Kratt, M. (2021). Adoption of artificial intelligence technologies in German SMEs: Results from an empirical study. In S. Hundal, A. Kostyuk, & D. Govorun (Eds.), Corporate governance: A search for emerging trends in the pandemic times (pp. 76–84). Virtus Inter Press.

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

Yeh, H.-C., Yu, M.-C., Liu, C.-H., & Huang, C.-I. (2023). Robo-advisor based on unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 35(4), 962–979. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-07-2021-0493

Zetzsche, D. A., Buckley, R. P., Arner, D. W., & Barberis, J. N. (2020). The rise of FinTech in Germany and Europe: Regulatory and technological challenges. European Business Organization Law Review, 21(4), 533–563.

Zhang, S. (2024). Consumer attitudes towards AI-based financial advice: Insights for decision support systems (DSS) and technology integration. Journal of Internet Services and Information Security, 14(4), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.58346/JISIS.2024.I4.001

Zhang, C., Hu, M., Wu, W., Kamran, F., & Wang, X. (2025). Unpacking perceived risks and AI trust influences pre-service teachers’ AI acceptance: A structural equation modeling-based multi-group analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 30(2), 2645–2672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12905-7

Published
2025-11-24
How to Cite
Kumari, A., Fazil, S., & Iqbal, N. (2025). Determinants Shaping Choices for Robo and Human Advisors in German Financial Market: A Theoretical Review. Journal of Finance and Accounting Research, 7(2), 93-115. https://doi.org/10.32350/jfar.72.04
Section
Articles