Investment, Poverty and Growth Nexus in Pakistan: Empirical Evidence from ARDL Modeling Approach to Co-Integration

Keywords: investment, poverty, growth, ARDL to Co-integration


This study analyzes the nexus of investment, poverty and growth in Pakistan. It will develop comprehensive macro economic model of Pakistan economy with the desire of amplification and provided that a long-term result for the determined investment-poverty-growth discrepancy veterans. The significant level of investment and sustained economic growth may be the major driving forces for poverty decrease in Pakistan. The level of investment also assists the poor through a direct allocation influence as well as tortuous growth effect, in both the long run and short run. To detect the long term and short term effects of economic development, poverty and investment, an ARDL modeling approach to co- integration is functional, which is the suitable technique  in excess of method of integration after examining the stationary level of the data through ADF Test. The bound testing approach is exploited for cointegration to analyze the presence of long term association amid variables and ECM models are verbalized for short term analysis. The model is predictable with time-series data from 1972 to 2013 confine mutually the long-run and short-run forceful goods of the economy. The model is subjected to a sequence of strategy situation  that assesses a mixture of options for government to recover the prolific ability of the economy, thus attain continued hasten growth and a decrease in  Pakistan`s poverty.

JEL Classification Codes: G12, G 14


Download data is not yet available.


Anwar, T. (2010). Role of growth and inequality in explaining changes in poverty in Pakistan. The Pakistan Development Review, 49(1) 1-17.

Baten, J., & Juif, D. (2014). A story of large landowners and math skills: Inequality and human capital formation in long-run development, 1820–2000. Journal of Comparative Economics, 42(2), 375-401.

Begum, S. S., Deng, Q., & Gustafsson, B. (2012). Economic growth and child poverty reduction in Bangladesh and China. Journal of Asian Economics, 23(1), 73-85.

Buffie, E. F., & Atolia, M. (2012). Trade, growth, and poverty in Zambia: Insights from a dynamic GE model. Journal of Policy Modeling, 34(2), 211-229.

Cicowiez, M., & Conconi, A. (2008). Linking Trade and Pro-Poor growth: Asurvey. In Cockburn, J & Giordano, P. (Ed.) Trade and Poverty in the Developing W, 7: The Poverty and Economic Policy.

Fields, G. S. (2007). How much should we care about changing income inequality in the course of economic growth?. Journal of Policy Modeling, 29(4), 577-585.

Fosu, A. K. (2010). Does inequality constrain poverty reduction programs? EvidencefromAfrica. Journal of Policy Modeling, 32(6), 818-827.

Fritzen, S. (2006). Growth, inequality and the future of poverty reduction in Vietnam. Journal of Asian Economics, 13(5), 635-657.

Jamal, H. (2006). Does inequality matter for poverty reduction? Evidence from Pakistan's poverty trends. The Pakistan Development Review, 45(3) 439-459.

Jalil, A., & Mahmud, S. F. (2009). Environment Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: Acointegration analysis for China. Energy Policy, 37(12), 5167-5172.

Kalim, R., & Shahbaz, M. (2009). Remittances and poverty nexus: Evidence from Pakistan. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 29, 46-59.

Lay, J., Thiele, R., & Wiebelt, M. (2004). Pro-poor growth in Bolivia: Accounting for external shocks and policy reforms (No. 1231). Kiel Working Paper.

Mehanna, R-A. (2004). Poverty and economic development: not as direct as it may seem. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 33(2), 217-228.

Meng, X., Gregory, R., & Wang, Y. (2005). Poverty, inequality, and growth in urban China, 1986–2000. Journal of Comparative Economics, 33(4), 710-729.

Montalvo, J. G., & Ravallion, M. (2009). The pattern of growth and poverty reduction in China. Policy Research Working Paper No 5069.

Naranpanawa, A., Bandara, J. S., & Selvanathan, S. (2011). Trade and poverty nexus: A case study of Sri Lanka. Journal of Policy Modeling, 33(2), 328-346.

Ntsalaze, L., & Ikhide, S. (2017). The threshold effects of household indebtedness on multidimensional poverty. International Journal of Social Economics, 44(11), 1471-1488.

Perera, L. D. H., & Lee, G. H. (2013). Have economic growth and institutional quality contributed to poverty and inequality reduction in Asia?. Journal of Asian Economics, 27, 71-86.

Salvatore, D. (2007). Growth, international inequalities, and poverty in a globalizing world. Journal of Policy Modeling, 29(4), 635-641.

Sial, H. M. & Cheema, R. A. (2012). Poverty, income inequality, and growth in Pakistan: The Pakistan Development Review, 45(3), 439–459.

Tabassum, A., & Majeed, M. T. (2008). Economic growth and income inequality relationship: role of credit market imperfection. The Pakistan Development Review, 47(4) 727-743.

Tsukita, S., Oishi, K., Sato, N., Sagara, J., & Kawai, A. (1994). ERM family members as molecular linkers between the cell surface glycoprotein CD44 and actin-based cytoskeletons. The Journal of Cell Biology, 126(2), 391-401.

Tirelli, A. (2018). Effects of Health Claims on Consumption and Taste in Children: The Moderating Effects of Sex (Doctoral dissertation, Université d'Ottawa/University of Ottawa).

Zaman, K., & Khilji, B. A. (2013). RETRACTED: The relationship between growth–inequality–poverty triangle and pro-poor growth policies in Pakistan: The twin disappointments. 30, 375-393,

Zaman, K., Khan, M. M., & Ahmad, M. (2012). RETRACTED: The relationship between foreign direct investment and pro-poor growth policies in Pakistan: The new interface, 29(4), 1220-1227.

Zhang, Y., & Wan, G. (2006). The impact of growth and inequality on rural poverty in China. Journal of Comparative Economics, 34(4), 694-712.

How to Cite
Ali, H., & Sharif, I. (2020). Investment, Poverty and Growth Nexus in Pakistan: Empirical Evidence from ARDL Modeling Approach to Co-Integration. Journal of Quantitative Methods, 4(1), 1-1.