Investment, Poverty and Growth Nexus in Pakistan: Empirical Evidence from ARDL Modeling Approach to Co-Integration
This study analyzes the nexus of investment, poverty and growth in Pakistan. It will develop comprehensive macro-economic model of Pakistan economy with the desire of amplification and provided that a long-term result for the determined investment-poverty-growth discrepancy veterans. The significant level of investment and sustained economic growth may be the major driving forces for poverty decrease in Pakistan. The level of investment also assists the poor through a direct allocation influence as well as tortuous growth effect, in both the long run and short run. To detect the long term and short term effects of economic development, poverty and investment, an ARDL modeling approach to co- integration is functional, which is the suitable technique in excess of method of integration after examining the stationary level of the data through ADF Test. The bound testing approach is exploited for co-integration to analyze the presence of long term association amid variables and ECM models are verbalized for short term analysis. The model is predictable with time-series data from 1972 to 2013 confine mutually the long-run and short-run forceful goods of the economy. The model is subjected to a sequence of strategy situation that assesses a mixture of options for government to recover the prolific ability of the economy, thus attain continued hasten growth and a decrease in Pakistan`s poverty.
Baten, J., & Juif, D. (2014). A story of large landowners and math skills: Inequality and human capital formation in long-run development, 1820–2000. Journal of comparative economics, 42(2), 375-401.
Begum, S. S., Deng, Q., & Gustafsson, B. (2012). Economic growth and child poverty reduction in Bangladesh and China. Journal of Asian Economics, 23(1), 73-85.
Buffie, E. F., & Atolia, M. (2012). Trade, growth, and poverty in Zambia: Insights from a dynamic GE model. Journal of Policy Modeling, 34(2), 211-229.
Chaudhry, S. I.et al. (2012).Human Capital Formation and Economic Growth in Pakistan.Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences (PJSS) 32 (1), pp.229-240.
Cicowiez, M., & Conconi, A. (2008). Linking Trade and Pro-Poor growth: a survey. Trade and Poverty in the Developing W, 7.
Fields, G. S. (2007). How much should we care about changing income inequality in the course of economic growth?. Journal of Policy Modeling, 29(4), 577-585.
Fosu, A. K. (2010). Does inequality constrain poverty reduction programs? Evidence from Africa. Journal of Policy Modeling, 32(6), 818-827.
Fritzen, S. (2006). Growth, inequality and the future of poverty reduction in Vietnam. Journal of Asian Economics, 13(5), 635-657.
Imai, K. S., Gaiha, R., Ali, A., & Kaicker, N. (2014). Remittances, growth and poverty: New evidence from Asian countries. Journal of Policy Modeling, 36(3), 524-538.
Jamal, H. (2006). Does inequality matter for poverty reduction? Evidence from Pakistan's poverty trends. The Pakistan development review, 439-459.
Jalil, A., & Mahmud, S. F. (2009). Environment Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: a cointegration analysis for China. Energy policy, 37(12), 5167-5172.
Kalim, R., & Shahbaz, M. (2009). Remittances and poverty nexus: Evidence from Pakistan. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 29, 46-59.
Lay, J., Thiele, R., & Wiebelt, M. (2004). Pro-poor growth in Bolivia: accounting for external shocks and policy reforms (No. 1231). Kiel Working Paper.
Mehanna, R. A. (2004). Poverty and economic development: not as direct as it may seem. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 33(2), 217-228.
Meng, X., Gregory, R., & Wang, Y. (2005). Poverty, inequality, and growth in urban China, 1986–2000. Journal of Comparative Economics, 33(4), 710-729.
Meng, X., Shen, K., & Xue, S. (2013). Economic reform, education expansion, and earnings inequality for urban males in China, 1988–2009. Journal of Comparative Economics, 41(1), 227-244.
Montalvo, J. G., & Ravallion, M. (2010). The pattern of growth and poverty reduction in China. Journal of Comparative Economics, 38(1), 2-16.
Naranpanawa, A., Bandara, J. S., & Selvanathan, S. (2011). Trade and poverty nexus: A case study of Sri Lanka. Journal of Policy Modeling, 33(2), 328-346.
Ntsalaze, L., & Ikhide, S. (2017). The threshold effects of household indebtedness on multidimensional poverty. International Journal of Social Economics, 44(11), 1471-1488.
Perera, L. D. H., & Lee, G. H. (2013). Have economic growth and institutional quality contributed to poverty and inequality reduction in Asia?. Journal of Asian Economics, 27, 71-86.
Salvatore, D. (2007). Growth, international inequalities, and poverty in a globalizing world. Journal of Policy Modeling, 29(4), 635-641.
Sial, H. M. and Cheema, R. A. (2012). Poverty, Income Inequality, and Growth in Pakistan: The Pakistan Development Review, 45(3), pp. 439–459.
Tabassum, A., & Majeed, M. T. (2008). Economic growth and income inequality relationship: role of credit market imperfection. The Pakistan Development Review, 727-743.
Tsukita, S., Oishi, K., Sato, N., Sagara, J., & Kawai, A. (1994). ERM family members as molecular linkers between the cell surface glycoprotein CD44 and actin-based cytoskeletons. The Journal of cell biology, 126(2), 391-401.
Tirelli, A. (2018). Effects of Health Claims on Consumption and Taste in Children: The Moderating Effects of Sex (Doctoral dissertation, Université d'Ottawa/University of Ottawa).
Zaman, K., & Khilji, B. A. (2013). RETRACTED: The relationship between growth–inequality–poverty triangle and pro-poor growth policies in Pakistan: The twin disappointments.
Zaman, K., Khan, M. M., & Ahmad, M. (2012). RETRACTED: The relationship between foreign direct investment and pro-poor growth policies in Pakistan: The new interface.
Zhang, Y., & Wan, G. (2006). The impact of growth and inequality on rural poverty in China. Journal of Comparative Economics, 34(4), 694-712.
Copyright (c) 2020 Hina Ali, Imran Sharif
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
JQM follow an open-access publishing policy and full text of all published articles is available free, immediately upon publication of an issue. The journal’s contents are published and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0) license. Thus, the work submitted to the journal implies that it is original, unpublished work of the authors (neither published previously nor accepted/under consideration for publication elsewhere). On acceptance of a manuscript for publication, a corresponding author on the behalf of all co-authors of the manuscript will sign and submit a completed the Copyright and Author Consent Form.